US H-1B Visa Changes: New Fees & “Gold Card” Program Introduced

Photo of author

By Lucas Rossi

The United States is implementing significant changes to its H-1B visa program, introducing substantial new fees and “gold card” initiatives aimed at reshaping how foreign talent is utilized within the country. These measures, enacted via presidential proclamation, signal a shift in immigration policy with potential ramifications for both U.S. businesses and the global talent pool. The core objective appears to be a recalibration of the economic incentives surrounding the employment of foreign workers, particularly in high-skilled sectors.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick articulated the administration’s intent, suggesting that the new $100,000 annual fee on H-1B visas is designed to deter large technology and other companies from solely relying on foreign labor. The economic calculus, as described, is intended to make extensive use of these visas less financially appealing, thereby encouraging domestic hiring. Reports indicate that major corporations are aware of and, according to one official, “on board” with these forthcoming changes, though the specifics of their alignment remain subject to interpretation.

New Fee Structure and “Gold Card” Programs

The most immediate change for foreign workers seeking employment in the U.S. is the introduction of a $100,000 annual fee levied on new H-1B visas. This fee is distinct from employee compensation and is intended as a direct cost to sponsoring companies. Importantly, this fee is confirmed to apply only to new visa applications, not to existing H-1B visa holders or renewal processes, offering a degree of continuity for those already within the system.

In parallel, the administration has introduced a tiered “gold card” program, designed to offer expedited pathways for wealthy individuals and businesses. The “gold card” itself requires a $1 million investment from individuals and $2 million from businesses. This corporate sponsorship allows companies to facilitate an employee’s visa process, with the added flexibility of transferring sponsorship to a different worker without incurring additional fees. A more exclusive “Trump Platinum Card” is also available at a $5 million price point, offering holders extended stays of up to 270 days annually without U.S. income tax liability on non-U.S. earnings.

Rationale and Impact on the Workforce

The H-1B visa program has been a focal point of immigration discourse, with criticisms often centering on its potential to depress wages and displace American workers. The White House has stated that this policy action is intended to “discourage companies from spamming the system and driving down wages” and to provide “certainty to American businesses” seeking to hire highly skilled foreign talent. Data cited by the White House suggests a significant rise in the proportion of IT workers holding H-1B visas, from 32% in fiscal year 2003 to over 65% in recent years. Concurrently, the administration pointed to unemployment rates among computer science and computer engineering graduates, suggesting the program may create disincentives for Americans pursuing STEM careers, which could impact national security.

Business and International Reactions

The implications of these policy shifts are already being felt. JPMorgan employees received advisories from their visa application handlers, Ogletree Deakins, recommending against international travel until further guidance is issued, as reported by Reuters. Amazon, according to Business Insider, issued similar internal guidance to its employees, urging H-1B status holders in the U.S. to remain within the country. This advisory also extended to H-4 visa holders (spouses of H-1B recipients), encouraging those abroad to return promptly.

The Indian technology sector, a significant beneficiary of the H-1B program, is also anticipating substantial impact. India’s Ministry of External Affairs acknowledged the substantial contributions of skilled talent mobility to innovation and economic growth in both nations, stating that policymakers will “assess recent steps taking into account mutual benefits.” Venture capital partner Deedy Das expressed concern on X, warning that these changes could create a “disincentive to attract the world’s smartest talent to the U.S.,” potentially hindering innovation and economic growth.

Share