Antarctic Krill Fishery Under Threat: Record Catch & Policy Deadlock Endanger Ecosystem

Photo of author

By Lucas Rossi

The delicate ecological balance of Antarctica is under unprecedented strain as krill fishing activities surge to historic levels, rapidly approaching a seasonal catch limit that could trigger an early closure of this vital fishery. This intensifying pressure on the Southern Ocean’s krill stocks, a cornerstone of the Antarctic ecosystem and a significant natural carbon sink, underscores a critical failure in international conservation efforts and highlights the escalating conflict between economic demand and environmental protection in one of the world’s most sensitive regions.

  • The 2024-25 Antarctic krill catch has reached 518,568 tons, approximately 84% of the 620,000-ton seasonal limit.
  • Intense fishing activity is increasingly concentrated in localized “hotspots,” intensifying pressure on vital marine habitats.
  • International negotiations to establish a new krill management plan and a large marine protected area collapsed last year.
  • This political impasse led to the expiration of 15-year-old spatial fishing restrictions, enabling concentrated harvesting.
  • Less than 5% of the Southern Ocean is currently protected, significantly below international conservation targets.

Recent data reveals a dramatic escalation in krill harvesting. In the first seven months of the 2024-25 season, the krill catch in Antarctica reached 518,568 tons, representing approximately 84% of the 620,000-ton limit. Once this threshold is met, it mandates an automatic closure of the fishery. A report from the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), the international body overseeing the fishery, indicates that in one specific hotspot, the catch through June 30 was nearly 60% higher than the entire haul of the previous year. This concentration of fishing activity in smaller areas raises significant concerns for conservation groups. As Capt. Peter Hammarstedt of Sea Shepherd Global noted, the practice is akin to harvesting a vast population entirely within a tiny, critical habitat.

Ecological and Economic Implications

Krill, despite an estimated global biomass of 63 million metric tons, face increasing threats from advanced fishing technologies, climate change, and surging global demand. These small crustaceans are not only vital as a primary food source for whales, seals, and penguins but also play a crucial role in mitigating climate change by sequestering an estimated 20 million tons of carbon annually, equivalent to removing 5 million cars from the road each year. The burgeoning market for krill’s Omega-3 rich oil, used in fishmeal, pet food, and human dietary supplements, drives this increased harvesting. The 2023-24 season saw a fleet of 12 industrial trawlers, primarily from Norway and China, net 498,350 tons, setting a record prior to the current season. This intense activity has led to observed incidents of whale entanglement in fishing nets, highlighting the direct competition between human industry and recovering marine populations.

Policy Deadlock and Regulatory Fallout

The current fishing boom follows the breakdown of international negotiations last year among the U.S., Russia, China, and two dozen other governments. These talks aimed to approve a new management plan that would have introduced measures such as spreading out catch areas and establishing a California-sized marine reserve in the environmentally sensitive Antarctic Peninsula. A tentative agreement collapsed when the United Kingdom and Australia introduced a last-minute proposal for an even lower catch limit, prompting China to withdraw its support for both the marine reserve and the renewal of the existing management system. This political impasse, as described by industry leaders, resulted in the expiration of catch limit restrictions adopted 15 years ago, effectively allowing the krill fleet to operate without previous spatial limitations and concentrate fishing efforts in sensitive habitats favored by marine wildlife. Currently, less than 5% of the Southern Ocean is protected, far short of CCAMLR’s targets and the United Nations’ goal of preserving 30% of global oceans by 2030.

From the industry’s perspective, the Association of Responsible Krill Harvesting Companies (ARCK), representing 95% of the Antarctic krill catch, supports the creation of marine protected areas but argues against delaying “ready-to-go measures” for quota increases. Javier Arata, ARCK’s executive director, stated that the failure to advance management was “political, not scientific,” asserting that current fishing levels remain sustainable and align with scientific consensus before last year’s deal faltered.

The escalating krill harvest in Antarctica represents a complex intersection of ecological necessity, global economic drivers, and international political deadlock. The outcome of this critical period will not only determine the future of Antarctic krill populations and the broader marine ecosystem but also serve as a significant test case for global cooperation in managing shared natural resources in the face of increasing commercial pressures and climate change challenges.

Share