EU Steel Faces Crisis: Job Losses Mount Amidst Imports & Tariffs

Photo of author

By Oliver “The Data Decoder”

The European steel industry is at a critical juncture, facing significant job losses and economic strain due to a combination of factors, including a surge in subsidized Chinese steel imports and restrictive trade policies enacted by the United States. This dual pressure threatens the livelihoods of millions and is prompting urgent calls for decisive action from European policymakers.

Navigating a Treacherous Trade Landscape

The European steel sector, a vital contributor to the continent’s economy and employment, is experiencing profound challenges. A primary concern stems from an influx of surplus steel from China, often benefiting from substantial state subsidies. This cheaper foreign steel directly competes with domestically produced material, eroding profit margins and jeopardizing the sustainability of European steel manufacturers. Adding to this pressure are the punitive tariffs imposed by the U.S. administration under President Donald Trump, which limit European access to the American market. This dynamic forces a greater volume of foreign steel, particularly from China, to be redirected towards the less protected European market, exacerbating the overcapacity issue.

This situation has already led to substantial job cuts. Thyssenkrupp Steel, a major German producer, has announced plans to eliminate as many as 11,000 positions by 2030, representing nearly 40% of its workforce. Similarly, ArcelorMittal, the world’s second-largest steel producer, is also facing potential layoffs across its European operations. These figures underscore the precarious state of the industry, with estimates suggesting that 18,000 jobs were lost in the EU steel sector alone in the past year.

Calls for Protection and Policy Intervention

In response to these mounting pressures, European industry leaders and labor unions have united in their demand for robust protective measures. EUROFER, the European steel association, has advocated for a significant reduction in foreign steel imports, proposing that they be cut by half. The organization highlights the critical risk of European exports being restricted by U.S. tariffs, while simultaneously facing an unprotected influx of diverted imports into the EU. This concern was amplified by a trade agreement reached between the EU and the U.S. in July, which, while easing some tensions, maintained high tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.

Industry representatives are actively pushing for the implementation of a tariff rate quota system. This proposal would involve imposing a 50% tariff on steel imports once they exceed a predetermined threshold. This approach aligns with suggestions put forth by France and supported by ten other EU member states, emphasizing that such measures should apply universally to all third countries. These calls for action come as existing safeguard measures, first implemented in 2019 to regulate foreign steel imports, are set to expire in 2026. EUROFER argues that these measures have already proven insufficient, with foreign steel imports doubling during the period they have been in effect.

Global Overcapacity and Future Negotiations

The challenges faced by the European steel industry are exacerbated by a broader global issue of overcapacity. Data from the OECD indicated that global steel overcapacity stood at an estimated 600 million tonnes in 2023, with projections suggesting a rise to 720 million tonnes in the coming year. This surplus capacity fuels aggressive export strategies by some nations, intensifying competition for global markets.

As the European Commission prepares to unveil new protective measures, negotiations with the United States are anticipated to resume. The EU hopes to persuade Washington to reconsider its tariff policies, while the U.S. administration, under President Trump, has indicated a focus on bolstering domestic production. This presents a complex diplomatic and economic challenge, as the future of European steel jobs hinges on finding a sustainable balance in international trade relations.

Sources

Share